Super sacrifice · 2026-27
What salary packaging into super really saves
The gap between your marginal rate and the 15% your fund pays is real money. Two things blunt it, and neither tends to come up when the arrangement is offered to you.
Caps and rates verified against the official sources — how we check.
Better off by, each year
$2,550
Cash plus super, against taking the same $15,000 as salary.
Reaches your fund $12,750Contributions tax $2,250
How it’s made up
Your study loan
Against the cap
Your compulsory study loan repayment is $7,570.80 whether you sacrifice or not.
Enter your details above to see this.
Money in super is preserved until you meet a condition of release, usually retirement. The benefit above is real but it is not spendable now. General information only — not financial or tax advice, and super decisions are worth taking properly.
Your study loan does not get cheaper. At all.
This is the claim worth checking before you sign anything. Salary sacrifice reduces your taxable income, and it is easy to assume every income-tested thing follows it down. Your compulsory study loan repayment does not, and the reason is precise rather than vague.
Repayment income is taxable income with reportable super contributions added back. Sacrificing subtracts an amount from one side of that sum and adds exactly the same amount to the other. The total cannot move. On the figures above, taxable income falls to $105,000 while the income your loan is assessed on stays at $120,000, and the repayment is $7,570.80 either way.
The income tax saving is genuine — $2,550 a year on these numbers. It is only the study loan part of the pitch that is not.
The cap is smaller than it looks
The concessional cap is $32,500, and it counts everything concessional, not just what you choose to sacrifice. Your employer’s 12% guarantee is concessional and is already inside it.
Enter your details above to see this.
| Salary | Employer guarantee | Room left to sacrifice |
|---|---|---|
| $80,000 | $9,600 | $22,900 |
| $120,000 | $14,400 | $18,100 |
| $180,000 | $21,600 | $10,900 |
| $240,000 | $28,800 | $3,700 |
| $280,000 | $32,499.60 | Effectively none |
Read the bottom row twice. The maximum contribution base is derived from the cap itself — the ATO calculates one from the other — so at the top of the scale the guarantee has consumed the entire cap and there is nothing left to sacrifice. Salary packaging into super is a middle-income tool, and the people most often sold it are sometimes the least able to use it.
Going over does not just fail to help. Excess concessional contributions are included in taxable income and taxed at the marginal rate, which removes the concession entirely for the amount over the cap.
Division 293, and the halved concession
Once income plus concessional contributions passes $250,000, an extra 15% is charged on those contributions. Division 293 tax is 15% of the excess over the threshold, OR of the taxable super contributions, whichever is less.
The effect is straightforward: the fund still pays 15% and Division 293 charges another 15%, so the effective rate on contributions becomes 30%. Against a top marginal rate the arrangement still works, but it works about half as well.
One thing this page gets right that is easy to get wrong: most of a high earner’s Division 293 bill is owed on the employer guarantee whatever they do. Only the extra amount your own sacrifice causes is charged against the decision here.
Three things that are true and reassuring
- Your employer super is untouched. Salary sacrifice super contributions do not reduce the amount an employer calculates the super entitlement on, and do not count towards the super guarantee. The employer must still pay the full guarantee as though no arrangement existed.
- No fringe benefits tax. Sacrificed super paid to a complying fund is not a fringe benefit and attracts no FBT.
- No statutory ceiling on the arrangement itself. There is no legislated limit on how much can be sacrificed unless the terms of employment set one — the limits that bite are the concessional cap and Division 293.
And one that is not: the money is preserved. A tax saving you cannot reach for thirty years is still a tax saving, but it is not the same as cash, and any comparison that treats it as cash is flattering the arrangement.
How this compares with a novated lease
Both are sold as salary packaging and both reduce taxable income, but they behave in opposite ways for anyone with a study loan.
| Sacrifice into super | Novated lease | |
|---|---|---|
| Effect on taxable income | Falls | Falls |
| Effect on study loan repayment | None at all | Rises |
| Why | Added back at face value | Added back grossed up |
| Limited by | The concessional cap | The car and the lease terms |
| When you can use the money | On retirement | Immediately — you drive it |
If you have a study loan, super is the neutral option and the novated lease is the one that needs modelling before you commit. Neither is a bad idea; they are simply not the same idea.
Frequently asked questions
Does salary sacrificing reduce my HECS repayment?
How much can I actually sacrifice?
Will sacrificing reduce the super my employer pays me?
Why do high earners get so little from this?
Is packaging into super better than a novated lease?
What if I did not use my cap in previous years?
Where these rules come from
- ATO — Super guarantee (rates and maximum contribution base).
- ATO — Contributions caps — ATO page last updated 2026-04-24.
- ATO — Salary sacrificing super — ATO page last updated 2026-04-21.
- ATO — Division 293 tax — ATO page last updated 2026-08-07.
Not modelled, and worth knowing: the 5-year carry-forward of unused cap, which needs your total super balance and your contribution history; the treatment of amounts over the cap beyond flagging that they buy nothing; and the parts of Division 293 income beyond salary and contributions. If your loan is the reason you are here, the HECS repayment calculator shows what repayment income actually drives. The methodology page lists what every calculator here does and does not do.